whoismike.co Essay · 005
April 2026 6 min read Personal

The things I keep coming back to.

There are things I say I believe and things I actually believe. The gap between them has narrowed over time — mostly by making enough mistakes to figure out which is which.

A note on how this was written. I wrote this essay. I used AI as a thought partner — to push back on weak arguments, tighten prose, and ask me better questions than I'd ask myself. The opinions and the mistakes are mine.

I used to be better at stating my values than living them. The PhD helped with that — not because academia teaches you integrity, but because it forces you to sit with the gap between what you claim and what the evidence actually supports. You learn, slowly, to hold your own beliefs at arm's length. It's uncomfortable. It's also useful.

These aren't aspirational. They're the things I keep returning to when work gets hard, when teams get stuck, when I'm trying to figure out what to do next.

Agency

I don't wait to be told what to do. I find what matters and go build it. This has occasionally gotten me into trouble — moving too fast, stepping on toes, solving problems nobody asked me to solve. But the alternative, waiting for permission to do the obvious thing, has always cost more.

The best teams I've been part of were full of people who operated this way. Not chaotically — with judgment. There's a version of agency that's just impulsiveness with better branding. The version I care about is the one where you own the outcome, not just the action.

Empathy

Understanding how other people think, feel, and make decisions isn't soft — it's strategic. It's what makes better products, better teams, and better outcomes. My PhD wasn't a detour from my career. It was preparation for it.

I spent years learning to take seriously the gap between what people say and what they mean, between what they want and what they need. That skill transfers everywhere. It's the most useful thing I own.

Curiosity

I ask a lot of questions. I read widely. I find the most interesting people in any room and try to understand how they think. Curiosity is the thread that connects everything else — the PhD, the travel, the career that crossed more functions than most.

I don't think of it as a personality trait. I think of it as a practice. Some days it's easier than others. But it's the thing I most consistently come back to when I've lost the thread of something.

Showing up for people

I care about the people I work with — not as resources, but as people. I show up. I listen. I remember what's going on in someone's life outside of the meeting we're in. This isn't a management style. It's just how I want to be treated, so it's how I try to treat others.

The quality of the relationships is inseparable from the quality of the work. I've seen high-performing teams that were genuinely good to each other, and I've seen the other kind. The difference in what they can sustain over time is not small.

Craft

I hold myself to a high standard. Not perfection — genuine craft. Knowing your domain deeply, being honest about what you don't know, and getting meaningfully better every time. I get frustrated when effort is mistaken for output, or when good enough is treated as done. That's not high standards. That's just caring about the thing.

The gap between what you say you believe and what you actually do is the most honest measure of character I know.

I haven't always closed that gap. I'm not sure anyone does, consistently. But trying to is most of it.